When I first saw Robert Bolt's A Man For All Seasons on my school reading list, I was skeptical. Very skeptical. Why? Two reasons.
~
First, it was a play. A play, written for actors to perform on a stage. How could that be any fun to sit down and read through? I'm just not the type who heads for the bookshelf, and then drags down a volume of Shakespeare for pleasure reading. (this is not to say I do not appreciate Shakespeare - he's just not my favorite, that's all). Furthermore, the protaganist of the play is a... Roman Catholic. How can I possibly sympathize with or root for a hero who follows the very heresies which the Reformers fought against?
~
These were my objections to A Man For All Seasons. And they were why I started reading it thinking, "This is not gonna be good." However, after several pages, I started rethinking things. I went on to enjoy one of the most engaging pieces of literature I have ever read. Period.
~
Bolt's play is a masterful exploration of the tumultuous conflict between King Henry VIII and Sir Thomas More. More, a long-time friend and favorite of the King, rose to the position of Lord Chancellor in the year 1529. However, when Henry VIII boke with the Romish Church after the Pope denied him a divorce from Catherine of Aragon, More resigned. Then, in 1534, Parliament passed a bill requiring all subjects to take an oath, acknowledging Henry to be supreme above all foreign rulers, including the Pope. More refused, and after imprisonment and repeated interrogation, was executed in 1535.
~
A Man For All Seasons scores high on several levels. The characters are vivid and convincing. The dialogue is superb. And the confrontations are about as intense as confrontions get. One of my favorite scenes is when More is being interrogated...
--------------------------
CRANMER (Clears his throat fussily) Sir Thomas, [the Act] states in the preamble that the King's former marriage, to the Lady Catherine, was unlawful, she being previously his brother's wife and the - er - "Pope" having no authority to sanction it. (Gently) Is that what you deny? (No reply) Is that what you dispute? (No reply) Is that what you are not sure of? (No reply)
NORFOLK Thomas, you insult the King and His Council in the person of the Lord Archbishop!
MORE I insult no one. I will not take the oath. I will not tell you why I will not.
NORFOLK Then your reasons must be treasonable!
MORE Not "must be"; may be.
NORFOLK It's a fair assumption!
MORE The law requires more than an assumption; the law requires a fact. (CROMWELL looks at him and away again)
CRANMER I cannot judge your legal standing in the case; but until I know the ground of your objection, I can only guess your spiritual standing too.
MORE (For a second furiously affronted; then humor overtakes him) If you're willing to guess at that, Your Grace, it should be a small matter to guess my objections.
CROMWELL (Quickly) You do have objections to the Act?
NORFOLK (Happily) Well, we know that, Cromwell!
MORE You don't, my lord. You may suppose I have objections. All you know is that I will not swear to it. From sheer delight to give you trouble it might be.
NORFOLK Is it material why you won't?
MORE It's most material. For refusing to swear, my goods are forfeit and I am condemned to life imprisonment. You cannot lawfully harm me further. But if you were right in supposing I had reasons for refusing and right again in supposing my reasons to be treasonable, the law would let you cut my head off.
NORFOLK (He has followed with some difficulty) Oh yes.
CROMWELL (An admiring murmur) Oh, well done, Sir Thomas. I've been trying to make that clear to His Grace for some time.
------------------------------
So, was I able to "sympathize" with More? Yes and no. Bolt's play is more than just a historical account set in 16th century England; it's the story of one man's determination to remain true to his convictions. By no means do I agree with all of More's convictions. To the contrary, I strongly disagree with him on many points. Yet I can still learn from him. Here was a man who recognized something that many people miss: that convictions aren't paltry things to be traded in when it's convenient. As a Christian young man, that's a truth I need to grasp as well. Wishy-washy people never accomplish anything worthwhile. People in this day and age hold onto their convictions way too loosely. Either that, or they have no convictions at all. They just have opinions.
~
I highly recommend A Man For All Seasons as both a riveting historical drama and a thought-provoking play, though not for readers under 14 (due to mature themes and some language). Do yourself a favor and read it. You'll enjoy it. If you don't, well... that's another subject altogether.
* * *
Persevero,